Concrete Protocol
TEMPEREDYield Vault · Ethereum · $100M+ TVL · 10 contracts
Confidence 55%Z-Factor 0.48Updated 2026-05-17Public Score
Public risk assessment — scores are produced with the same methodology as monitored protocols
688
BRI Score
3004756508251000
Security Profile
Access Control
68
68
Economic Soundness
62
62
Oracle Integrity
70
70
Compositional Risk
55
55
Governance
42
42
Maturity
32
32
Resilience
50
50
Supply Chain
72
72
Op Security
47
47
Cascade Exposure
100
100
Access Ctrl
68
68
Economic
62
62
Oracle
70
70
Compos.
55
55
Govern.
42
42
Maturity
32
32
Resilience
50
50
Supply Ch.
72
72
OpSec
47
47
Cascade
100
100
Min
32
Avg
60
Max
100
Audit History
Cantina Competition
2024-11
Bug Bounty Program
$50,000
Max payout on Cantina
Assessment
Very new yield optimization protocol with minimal battle testing. Extremely low maturity (Z=0.143, D6=32) is the dominant risk factor. Governance centralization (D5=42) and unproven economics compound the risk. Score reflects high uncertainty.
Dimension Breakdown
How scores work →Access Control
Weight 18%55% conf
68
arrow_forwardModerate
+17Vault-based architecture with strategist controls
+17Admin roles for vault configuration and strategy allocation
+17Deposit/withdrawal access through vault interface
+17Limited public documentation on permission model
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Economic Soundness
Weight 13%52% conf
62
arrow_forwardModerate
+21Yield optimization via strategy rotation
+21Economic model unproven at scale
-38Fee structure not yet stress-tested
+21Token incentives may distort real yield
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Oracle Integrity
Weight 13%55% conf
70
arrow_forwardGood
+18Standard oracle dependencies for asset pricing
+18Strategy valuation relies on underlying protocol oracles
+18Limited information on oracle failure handling
+18New protocol = oracle integration maturity unknown
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Battle-Tested Maturity
Weight 12%50% conf
32
arrow_forwardCritical
+8Mainnet since Q1 2026 (~3 months)
+8Extremely new protocol
+8Limited TVL and usage history
-68Initial audits completed but minimal battle testing
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Governance & Upgradeability
Weight 10%55% conf
42
arrow_forwardConcerning
+21Team-controlled governance (early stage)
-29No meaningful decentralization yet
+21Vault parameters controlled by admin
-29Governance structure not yet established
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Adversarial Resiliencelock
Weight 10%30% conf
50
Concerning
- Maximum resilience under independent adversarial testing
- Comprehensive security coverage across all attack surfaces
- Mature codebase with extensive battle testing
- No validated adversarial findings — score set to neutral baseline
Operational Security
Weight 10%35% conf
47
arrow_forwardConcerning
-8No branch protection detected
-8CI/CD present but unstable (0% success)
+47Strong PR review culture (100% reviewed)
-8Minimal development activity (0 commits/month)
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Compositional Risk
Weight 5%58% conf
55
arrow_forwardModerate
+14Yield optimization composes across DeFi protocols
+14Strategy allocation creates multi-protocol exposure
+14New strategies may add untested composition paths
+14Bounded by vault architecture but wide strategy surface
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Cascade Exposure
Weight 5%50% conf
100
arrow_forwardExcellent
+50Member of 1 dependency cluster(s)
0No cross-protocol cascade exposure detected
0Score: 100/100 (higher = more isolated from systemic risk)
+50Source: cross_protocol_composition.json dependency analysis
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Supply Chain
Weight 4%60% conf
72
arrow_forwardGood
+18Standard Solidity dependencies
+18Vault pattern from established libraries
+18Strategy contracts add dependency surface
+18New codebase = limited dependency audit depth
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Risk Drivers
Primary risk factors driving this score, ordered by severity.
Battle-Tested Maturity32
Governance & Upgradeability42
Operational Security47
Adversarial Risk Signals
Observable security posture indicators. These signals reflect publicly verifiable information and responsible disclosure outcomes. No specific vulnerability details are exposed.
Disclosure HistoryNot Assessed
Remediation VelocityNot Assessed
Bug Bounty ProgramNot Assessed
Audit CoverageNot Assessed
Incident HistoryNot Assessed
Score History & Verification
Score provenance tracking begins with the next reassessment.
On-Chain Data
- Protocol Slug
- "concrete"
- Oracle
- BRORegistry (Base)
- Evidence
- IPFS (pinned)
- Staleness Threshold
- 24 hours
Read Score
registry.getScore("concrete")Reduce exploitable risk
BlackHart Monitoring provides continuous adversarial analysis, vulnerability detection, remediation support, and verified reassessment when your risk posture improves.