RedStone
TEMPEREDOracle Infrastructure · Multi-chain · N/A (oracle) TVL · 5 contracts
Confidence 63%Z-Factor 0.68Updated 2026-05-17Public Score
Public risk assessment — scores are produced with the same methodology as monitored protocols
747
BRI Score
3004756508251000
Security Profile
Access Control
72
72
Economic Soundness
75
75
Oracle Integrity
78
78
Compositional Risk
60
60
Governance
48
48
Maturity
52
52
Resilience
50
50
Supply Chain
75
75
Op Security
54
54
Cascade Exposure
100
100
Access Ctrl
72
72
Economic
75
75
Oracle
78
78
Compos.
60
60
Govern.
48
48
Maturity
52
52
Resilience
50
50
Supply Ch.
75
75
OpSec
54
54
Cascade
100
100
Min
48
Avg
66
Max
100
Audit History
Peckshield
2023-08
ABDK
2023-05
Quantstamp
2024-01
Bug Bounty Program
$250,000
Max payout on Immunefi
Assessment
Modular oracle protocol competing with Chainlink (28 months). D5 low (48) for centralized governance. D6 moderate (52) for limited maturity. Innovative calldata-based model but newer attack surface. D4 low (60) as oracle failures cascade to consumers.
Dimension Breakdown
How scores work →Access Control
Weight 18%70% conf
72
arrow_forwardGood
+18Data provider whitelist controlled by team
+18Relayer access for push-based feeds
+18On-demand pull model reduces admin surface
+18Provider authorization centrally managed
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Economic Soundness
Weight 13%68% conf
75
arrow_forwardGood
-12Oracle service fee model (not DeFi lending)
-12No direct economic exploit surface in core
+38Data provider staking mechanism
+38Lower economic attack surface than DeFi protocols
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Oracle Integrity
Weight 13%75% conf
78
arrow_forwardGood
+26Modular oracle design (Core, Classic, X models)
+26Multi-provider data aggregation
+26EVM calldata-based price injection (innovative but novel)
-22Deduction: calldata model is newer attack surface vs storage
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Battle-Tested Maturity
Weight 12%60% conf
52
arrow_forwardConcerning
+17Live since early 2023 (~28 months)
+17Growing adoption but still establishing track record
-48No known exploit but limited stress history
+17Z-factor: 0.824
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Governance & Upgradeability
Weight 10%60% conf
48
arrow_forwardConcerning
+16Team-controlled protocol parameters
-52No on-chain governance mechanism
+16Data provider set controlled centrally
+16Limited decentralization of oracle operations
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Adversarial Resiliencelock
Weight 10%30% conf
50
Concerning
- Maximum resilience under independent adversarial testing
- Comprehensive security coverage across all attack surfaces
- Mature codebase with extensive battle testing
- No validated adversarial findings — score set to neutral baseline
Operational Security
Weight 10%35% conf
54
arrow_forwardConcerning
-8No branch protection detected
-8No CI/CD pipeline detected
+27Moderate development (17 commits/month)
-8Incident response time not available (using commit frequency proxy)
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Compositional Risk
Weight 5%65% conf
60
arrow_forwardModerate
+15Oracle consumed by many DeFi protocols
+15Multi-chain deployment increases composition surface
+15Calldata injection model means consumer must integrate correctly
+15Integration errors can cause downstream failures
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Cascade Exposure
Weight 5%55% conf
100
arrow_forwardExcellent
+33Appears in 1 cross-protocol cascade chain(s)
+33Member of 2 dependency cluster(s)
0Score: 100/100 (higher = more isolated from systemic risk)
+33Source: cross_protocol_composition.json dependency analysis
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Supply Chain
Weight 4%70% conf
75
arrow_forwardGood
+19Modern Solidity (0.8.x)
+19Standard dependencies
+19Multi-chain deployment infrastructure
+19Calldata injection adds unique supply chain element
receipt_longView provenance chainarrow_forward
Risk Drivers
Primary risk factors driving this score, ordered by severity.
Governance & Upgradeability48
Adversarial Resilience50
Battle-Tested Maturity52
Adversarial Risk Signals
Observable security posture indicators. These signals reflect publicly verifiable information and responsible disclosure outcomes. No specific vulnerability details are exposed.
Disclosure HistoryNot Assessed
Remediation VelocityNot Assessed
Bug Bounty ProgramNot Assessed
Audit CoverageNot Assessed
Incident HistoryNot Assessed
Score History & Verification
Score provenance tracking begins with the next reassessment.
On-Chain Data
- Protocol Slug
- "redstone"
- Oracle
- BRORegistry (Base)
- Evidence
- IPFS (pinned)
- Staleness Threshold
- 24 hours
Read Score
registry.getScore("redstone")Reduce exploitable risk
BlackHart Monitoring provides continuous adversarial analysis, vulnerability detection, remediation support, and verified reassessment when your risk posture improves.